<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tutorial Removed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/news/how-to-make-a-creatively-designed-moto-banner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/news/how-to-make-a-creatively-designed-moto-banner/</link>
	<description>Photoshop Tutorials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:27:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/news/how-to-make-a-creatively-designed-moto-banner/comment-page-4/#comment-155849</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psdtuts.com/?p=1887#comment-155849</guid>
		<description>Please let me know. May I use your tutorials to do my own pictures (which naturaly resemble your ones) and sell them (my pictures) to other people? May I do this with the help of microstocks (Fotolia, Dreamstime, Istockphoto, Shutterstock and others)? 
What does really mean your phrase in the end of the page (&quot;The effects and techniques demonstrated in tutorials on the Tuts+ network can be used in whatever manner you wish without attribution&quot;)? 
Please let me know. I expect your answer. Thank you, in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please let me know. May I use your tutorials to do my own pictures (which naturaly resemble your ones) and sell them (my pictures) to other people? May I do this with the help of microstocks (Fotolia, Dreamstime, Istockphoto, Shutterstock and others)?<br />
What does really mean your phrase in the end of the page (&#8220;The effects and techniques demonstrated in tutorials on the Tuts+ network can be used in whatever manner you wish without attribution&#8221;)?<br />
Please let me know. I expect your answer. Thank you, in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shade</title>
		<link>http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/news/how-to-make-a-creatively-designed-moto-banner/comment-page-4/#comment-129741</link>
		<dc:creator>Shade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 14:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psdtuts.com/?p=1887#comment-129741</guid>
		<description>If the price per a tut was higher, i&#039;m sure the more skilled would more often. At such a low price point for the work it takes to write an expert tutorial, the cost for the time is simply just not worth it in many peoples eyes. I&#039;m just reiterating what has already been said several times within the comments, but i figured you needed someone to direct you to that fact with a laser pointer or something else flashy to pick up on the obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the price per a tut was higher, i&#8217;m sure the more skilled would more often. At such a low price point for the work it takes to write an expert tutorial, the cost for the time is simply just not worth it in many peoples eyes. I&#8217;m just reiterating what has already been said several times within the comments, but i figured you needed someone to direct you to that fact with a laser pointer or something else flashy to pick up on the obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fedup</title>
		<link>http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/news/how-to-make-a-creatively-designed-moto-banner/comment-page-4/#comment-111903</link>
		<dc:creator>fedup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psdtuts.com/?p=1887#comment-111903</guid>
		<description>If you ever attended an art school you know how brutal the critiques can be especially when you&#039;ve worked hard.  But in those instances, the instructor is actively teaching students how to provide CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM that will allow the artist to move forward.  What I&#039;m seeing here in these comments are nothing short of abuse.  And I like the suggestion to start tagging tutorials based on skill level but I also support comment moderation as well.

Some of these so-called experts should start writing their own tutorial and maybe we&#039;ll see subsequent tuts follow suit.  Enough with the complaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you ever attended an art school you know how brutal the critiques can be especially when you&#8217;ve worked hard.  But in those instances, the instructor is actively teaching students how to provide CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM that will allow the artist to move forward.  What I&#8217;m seeing here in these comments are nothing short of abuse.  And I like the suggestion to start tagging tutorials based on skill level but I also support comment moderation as well.</p>
<p>Some of these so-called experts should start writing their own tutorial and maybe we&#8217;ll see subsequent tuts follow suit.  Enough with the complaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strony internetowe</title>
		<link>http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/news/how-to-make-a-creatively-designed-moto-banner/comment-page-4/#comment-111201</link>
		<dc:creator>strony internetowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psdtuts.com/?p=1887#comment-111201</guid>
		<description>Maybe it was a mistake :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it was a mistake <img src='http://psd.tutsplus.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/news/how-to-make-a-creatively-designed-moto-banner/comment-page-4/#comment-110770</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psdtuts.com/?p=1887#comment-110770</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the plagiarized tutorials should be on the PLUS account only, and let us mere mortals have the good tutorials that don&#039;t get removed?

I agree with Woman (2 posts above). Most of the comments here are not constructive. I realize many readers/posters may be under 14, but if you&#039;re on this site it&#039;s a sign you&#039;re willing to learn and improve yourself. Improving your grammar and ability to communicate with words are no less important than improving your ability to communicate with visuals.

If you&#039;re not able to elucidate why you feel the tutorial is lacking, your comment is actually empty and pointless. Support your claim.

Oh, and words like &quot;sucks&quot;... leave them to the fifth graders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the plagiarized tutorials should be on the PLUS account only, and let us mere mortals have the good tutorials that don&#8217;t get removed?</p>
<p>I agree with Woman (2 posts above). Most of the comments here are not constructive. I realize many readers/posters may be under 14, but if you&#8217;re on this site it&#8217;s a sign you&#8217;re willing to learn and improve yourself. Improving your grammar and ability to communicate with words are no less important than improving your ability to communicate with visuals.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not able to elucidate why you feel the tutorial is lacking, your comment is actually empty and pointless. Support your claim.</p>
<p>Oh, and words like &#8220;sucks&#8221;&#8230; leave them to the fifth graders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPOX studios</title>
		<link>http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/news/how-to-make-a-creatively-designed-moto-banner/comment-page-4/#comment-110620</link>
		<dc:creator>IPOX studios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psdtuts.com/?p=1887#comment-110620</guid>
		<description>I agree with NGP and Adam. Take the techniques, add your own images and creativity and make something YOU like. Give the guy and PSD tuts a break. This website rules, and it&#039;s free!!!!! Keep up the good work PSD tuts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with NGP and Adam. Take the techniques, add your own images and creativity and make something YOU like. Give the guy and PSD tuts a break. This website rules, and it&#8217;s free!!!!! Keep up the good work PSD tuts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woman</title>
		<link>http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/news/how-to-make-a-creatively-designed-moto-banner/comment-page-4/#comment-109936</link>
		<dc:creator>Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 02:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psdtuts.com/?p=1887#comment-109936</guid>
		<description>Right. So I&#039;ve read through a lot of the comments here and think the vast majority of you are being immature. Instead of &#039;oh this sucks!&#039; or &#039;what a crap tutorial&#039;, give constructive criticism. Telling someone that what they&#039;ve done sucks is not productive or helpful. I don&#039;t know what the tutorial looks like as it has been taken down now, but I don&#039;t actually care. If you see a tutorial that you do not think is efficient or even in the slightest bit helpful, instead of making the creator feel like trash over their efforts, say you didn&#039;t like the tutorial and then TELL THEM WHY!!! It&#039;s not hard okay? There really is no need for the low standard of comments and abuse left on these sorts of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. So I&#8217;ve read through a lot of the comments here and think the vast majority of you are being immature. Instead of &#8216;oh this sucks!&#8217; or &#8216;what a crap tutorial&#8217;, give constructive criticism. Telling someone that what they&#8217;ve done sucks is not productive or helpful. I don&#8217;t know what the tutorial looks like as it has been taken down now, but I don&#8217;t actually care. If you see a tutorial that you do not think is efficient or even in the slightest bit helpful, instead of making the creator feel like trash over their efforts, say you didn&#8217;t like the tutorial and then TELL THEM WHY!!! It&#8217;s not hard okay? There really is no need for the low standard of comments and abuse left on these sorts of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/news/how-to-make-a-creatively-designed-moto-banner/comment-page-4/#comment-109756</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 07:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psdtuts.com/?p=1887#comment-109756</guid>
		<description>Some of you feel we should give the guy a break, that he is &quot;cutting his teeth&quot;. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m all for people starting somewhere and begininng to learn stuff, and sharing their techniques along the way.

The point is this site, psdtuts, is more geared for advanced/intermediate photoshop users. Stuff you&#039;ll say &quot;wow&quot; to. This isn&#039;t a place for amatuer postings or articles. Atleast that&#039;s how it was in the begininng. 

That&#039;s why there&#039;s the &quot;outrage&quot;. I did have a plus membership but I let it lapse, and this is one of the reasons why. While 22 bucks for 3 months isn&#039;t a huge sum, it&#039;s not really worth it to get crappy college tutorials.

I would really like to see more text based and effect tutorials. Stuff that the .psd files actually mean something to download. I have the quick gold and metal text .psd files that I refer to repeatedly to get the styles from. Custom brushes, shapes, gradients, styles, textures, etc is worth the money monthly. If these kinds of things were posted repeatedly I would renew my subscription in a heartbeat.

As it stands now this is the first time I&#039;ve been here in about a month, not because it&#039;s all bad, just because there is no &quot;must have&quot; reason to visit the site daily. I don&#039;t think you need to post one mediocre tutorial a day when you could post a couple high quality tutorials per week so we don&#039;t have to drudge though stuff like this.  Again I&#039;m not really trying to bash on the guy who posted this, we all start somewhere, it&#039;s just when you&#039;re paying money to join an advanced photoshop site, this isn&#039;t advanced stuff.

I just dropped 130 bucks for Advanced Photoshop magazine. That shows I am will to pay for quality stuff. Like one poster said, up the price to 250 bucks, and then only post a 2 or 3 tuts a week. It&#039;s the same price really, except you now have high quality stuff, and people are willing to pay for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you feel we should give the guy a break, that he is &#8220;cutting his teeth&#8221;. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m all for people starting somewhere and begininng to learn stuff, and sharing their techniques along the way.</p>
<p>The point is this site, psdtuts, is more geared for advanced/intermediate photoshop users. Stuff you&#8217;ll say &#8220;wow&#8221; to. This isn&#8217;t a place for amatuer postings or articles. Atleast that&#8217;s how it was in the begininng. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why there&#8217;s the &#8220;outrage&#8221;. I did have a plus membership but I let it lapse, and this is one of the reasons why. While 22 bucks for 3 months isn&#8217;t a huge sum, it&#8217;s not really worth it to get crappy college tutorials.</p>
<p>I would really like to see more text based and effect tutorials. Stuff that the .psd files actually mean something to download. I have the quick gold and metal text .psd files that I refer to repeatedly to get the styles from. Custom brushes, shapes, gradients, styles, textures, etc is worth the money monthly. If these kinds of things were posted repeatedly I would renew my subscription in a heartbeat.</p>
<p>As it stands now this is the first time I&#8217;ve been here in about a month, not because it&#8217;s all bad, just because there is no &#8220;must have&#8221; reason to visit the site daily. I don&#8217;t think you need to post one mediocre tutorial a day when you could post a couple high quality tutorials per week so we don&#8217;t have to drudge though stuff like this.  Again I&#8217;m not really trying to bash on the guy who posted this, we all start somewhere, it&#8217;s just when you&#8217;re paying money to join an advanced photoshop site, this isn&#8217;t advanced stuff.</p>
<p>I just dropped 130 bucks for Advanced Photoshop magazine. That shows I am will to pay for quality stuff. Like one poster said, up the price to 250 bucks, and then only post a 2 or 3 tuts a week. It&#8217;s the same price really, except you now have high quality stuff, and people are willing to pay for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom H.</title>
		<link>http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/news/how-to-make-a-creatively-designed-moto-banner/comment-page-4/#comment-109327</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psdtuts.com/?p=1887#comment-109327</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to say that this is a shame...but.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to say that this is a shame&#8230;but.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://psd.tutsplus.com/articles/news/how-to-make-a-creatively-designed-moto-banner/comment-page-4/#comment-109053</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 01:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psdtuts.com/?p=1887#comment-109053</guid>
		<description>@Funkfish before you start telling people to shut up you should consider that the people who complained actually did psdtuts a service i.e. the tutorial was removed for breaking copyright. also we are letting psdtuts know that we want this site to keep to it&#039;s high standards. if you don&#039;t like that maybe you should leave the site and visit one of the many crappy tuts sites where people aren&#039;t criticised and where any old plagiarised and useless tut is tolerated. 

I for one would rather see this site remain high quality and full of inspirational tuts than let it descend into rubbish for the sake of not wanting to hurt anyone&#039;s feelings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Funkfish before you start telling people to shut up you should consider that the people who complained actually did psdtuts a service i.e. the tutorial was removed for breaking copyright. also we are letting psdtuts know that we want this site to keep to it&#8217;s high standards. if you don&#8217;t like that maybe you should leave the site and visit one of the many crappy tuts sites where people aren&#8217;t criticised and where any old plagiarised and useless tut is tolerated. </p>
<p>I for one would rather see this site remain high quality and full of inspirational tuts than let it descend into rubbish for the sake of not wanting to hurt anyone&#8217;s feelings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.100 seconds -->
